simonreadbooks

Archive for 2012|Yearly archive page

Enough

In Uncategorized on December 14, 2012 at 11:51 am

One child–let alone 18–shot to death in their elementary school classroom outweighs any argument against gun control.

I think that pretty much sums it up.

Defending the self-published

In publishing on December 5, 2012 at 11:31 am

books

As I work on my current book project for UK publisher The History Press and prepare for Constable & Robinson’s British release of Human Game in March, my thoughts have been turning—with increasing frequency—to self-publishing. My first book, On the House, was released by Penguin in 2005 and went out of print a couple of years ago. Since the rights have reverted back to me, I have toyed with the idea of publishing the book myself in Amazon’s Kindle Store to give it a second chance at life.

While researching the benefits and pitfalls of releasing a book without a traditional publisher’s backing, I stumbled across a Forbes article in which a couple of mega-selling authors trash self-published writers (the article was published in August, so I’m a bit late coming to it). Here is what Sue Grafton, author of numerous mysteries–such as A is for Alibi and C is for Corpse–had to say on the subject. Judging from the following quote, I assume “B is for Bitchy”:

To me, it seems disrespectful…that a ‘wannabe’ assumes it’s all so easy s/he can put out a ‘published novel’ without bothering to read, study, or do the research. … Self-publishing is a short cut and I don’t believe in short cuts when it comes to the arts. I compare self-publishing to a student managing to conquer Five Easy Pieces on the piano and then wondering if s/he’s ready to be booked into Carnegie Hall.

Maybe “S is for Snotty.” This quote astounds me. Why would Ms. Grafton assume a self-published author is a “wannabe” who thinks writing and publishing are easy? Anyone who has the discipline to sit down, write every day, and complete a manuscript knows there’s nothing easy about it. People can read, study, and do research into traditional publishing, but it doesn’t mean they’re going to get published. Think of how many great writers there must be out there who have been unable to land a traditional writing contract. Maybe someone did do their research and decided traditional publishing wasn’t for them. What’s wrong if they want to share their work with others? Ms. Grafton says self-publishing is a short cut—and that there should be no short cuts in art. James Joyce self-published Ulysses. Does that make Joyce a “wannabe”? Self-published authors have to hire graphic designers to do the book covers, editors to go over the manuscript, and they have to try and market and promote the book themselves–there’s nothing easy about any of that.

This brings me to the next quote—this one from thriller writer Brad Thor, author of Black List and Full Black, among others:

The important role that publishers fill is to separate the wheat from the chaff. If you’re a good writer and have a great book you should be able to get a publishing contract.

If traditional publishers “separate the wheat from the chaff,” how does one explain Fifty Shades of Gray or Twilight (my apologies to fans of James and Meyer)? What about books supposedly written by Snooki or Paris Hilton? If you’re a good writer, you hope you’ll land a publishing contract. What Mr. Thor seems to ignore, however, is that a publishing contract in no way guarantees success. You could have your book released by a major publishing house, only to face the frustration of seeing said publisher do nothing to promote or market the work. I spent three years working on one book only to see it come out in a blaze of obscurity: zero publicity and miserable distribution. It was a shattering experience. Yes, it was released in hardcover by a major publisher. And while I did everything I could to get the word out, one can only do so much.

Thor and Grafton must be oblivious to the fact that they’re the exception—not the rule. They’ve achieved a level of success most struggling authors will never attain. It seems contemptuous to verbally smack around authors who are simply trying to get their work into the hands of readers. Now, yes, I agree there’s a lot of crap that’s self-published. But there’s a lot of crap that’s been released through traditional publishing houses, too. In the end, it should be for readers to decide what’s good or bad. One reader’s James Patterson is another’s Raymond Chandler.

I’ve had six non-fiction books released thus far by major publishers in the United States and Britain, and am considering self-publishing. I don’t believe that makes me a “wannabe.” I don’t believe talented authors who’ve been unable to land publishing contracts and decide to self-publish are “wannabes,” either. They’re just as passionate about what they do as Grafton or Thor. I’ll even venture to say some are just as—if not more—talented.

The Blackout Ripper and other items . . .

In Random thoughts on November 26, 2012 at 8:56 pm

“He looked so normal.”

This past Sunday, the Crime and Investigation Network in the UK aired the episode of “Murder Casebook with Fred Dinenage,” which I filmed back in February. As I currently live in the States, I have not yet had a chance to see it—but I’m told I held my own! This specific episode focused on RAF cadet Gordon Frederick Cummins, a serial killer who murdered four women and attacked two others during a four-day spree of grisly violence in London, February 1942. His use of sharp implements earned him the nickname “The Blackout Ripper.” In 2005, I wrote a book on the case, published in the UK as The Blackout Murders and in the U.S. as In the Dark.

The American paperback edition is now out of print, though it is still available from Penguin as an e-book. The British publisher, JR Books, still has copies in stock, which are available on Amazon.co.uk. I’m actually hoping to have a new edition of the book published in the UK in the year ahead, so please keep your eyes on this site for more information as it becomes available.

One Scotland Yard detective who worked the Blackout Ripper case compared the gruesome nature of the killings to those of Jack the Ripper. What startled investigators about Cummins was not the ferocity of his attacks, however, but the frequency with which he struck: one woman a day for the better part of a week. Following his arrest, Cummins refused to admit any wrongdoing. In fact, he claimed to remember nothing about any of the nights the killings took place. The closest he came to confessing was in a letter he penned to his wife on the eve of his execution. “Although I don’t know, I think I must be guilty,” he wrote. “The evidence is overwhelming.”

UK Release Date: 7 March 2013

Since “Murder Casebook” has resulted in quite a lot of traffic to my website, I thought I better get a new entry up and share the latest in regards to current projects.

The British publication date for Human Game: Hunting the Great Escape Murderers is set for March 7. There’s already been some interest from UK papers wanting to publish excerpts, so my fingers are crossed for some major publicity hits. The publisher—Constable & Robinson—has done an amazing job with the cover, which I’m going to have made into a poster for my office wall. I’ll post any publicity updates as they happen!

I’ll also post a link here once it’s ready for pre-order on Amazon.co.uk.

For British publisher The History Press, I’m working on The Case that Foiled Fabian, a detailed account of the 1945 murder of farm laborer Charles Walton in the Cotswolds village of Lower Quinton. The killing remains unsolved and stumped the most famous detective of the day, Scotland Yard Superintendent Robert Fabian—otherwise known as “Fabian of the Yard.” Fabian believed he knew who the killer was, but he lacked the evidence to prove it. Rumor and speculation have swirled around the killing for the past sixty-plus years, with many claiming it was a ritual witchcraft murder. The book I’m writing, I hope, will set the record straight once and for all.

I’m making good progress and should be hitting the 60,000-word mark in the next week or so. It’s due at the publisher in May. Naturally, I’ll keep you posted on all developments.

What I’m working on now . . .

In Writing on November 5, 2012 at 9:33 am

On the morning of February 14, 1945, a seventy-four-year-old farm laborer named Charles Walton left his thatched-roof cottage in the English village of Lower Quinton and went to work in the nearby fields, cutting hedges for a local farmer. When he didn’t return home by sunset, his niece—Edith—got worried and went searching for him. It was a cold, misty night. Accompanied by a neighbor and the farmer who employed Walton, Edith went looking in the fields where her uncle worked. In the far corner of one meadow, the light from their torches fell on a horrible site. There lay poor Charles, pinned to the ground with his pitchfork, which had been plunged through his face. The slashing hook he used to trim the hedges was buried in his throat.

The local constabulary was ill-equipped to handle a case of such magnitude and requested assistance from Scotland Yard’s Murder Squad. The Yard sent their most famous manhunter, Detective-Superintendent Robert Fabian—known nationally through his policing exploits as “Fabian of the Yard.” In 1940s Britain, Fabian was almost a celebrity, having cracked some of the country’s most high-profile cases. How hard would it be to track down a killer in a village of 493 people?

In the event, the Lower Quinton murder would prove to be one case Fabian couldn’t solve. The crime remains an open homicide in the files of the Warwickshire Constabulary. The murder is considered by many to be the last ritual witchcraft killing in Britain. It’s claimed by some that Walton was a witch slain because of various activities tied to black magic. Others believe he was simply the unfortunate victim of an exceedingly brutal killer. The book I’m currently working, The Case That Foiled Fabian, to be released in 2014 by UK publisher The History Press, will examine Walton’s murder and the various theories that continue to swirl around it. I’m 45,000 words in and hope to have the first draft done by the end of January. It’s due at the publisher on May 1.

I’ve been so busy with researching and writing, I’ve had little time to update my blog. My apologies—but at least I have a somewhat decent reason for my lazy blogging habits as of late. As I move closer to the finish line, I’ll post more details on the book. I’ll be in England over Christmas and will be venturing to Lower Quinton to conduct a bit more research (I did some there this past February). Through Scotland Yard case files and an old photograph I found, I’ve located the actual field and the spot where Walton died, so I plan on snapping a few pictures.

Apparently, the villagers are awfully sensitive when it comes to the crime. I have to be honest and say I don’t know why. If it was a recent event, I’d certainly understand—but it happened nearly sixty years ago. You don’t see people in London’s East End still bent out of shape over Jack the Ripper—nor do you see San Francisco residents still up in arms over the Zodiac killer. Oh, well. Stay tuned for more details!

Thoughts on an under-appreciated author

In author on October 16, 2012 at 8:22 am

Copyright Screenplay How To

A couple of weeks ago, while sorting through a box of paperbacks in my garage, I stumbled across a novel by crime writer Roderick Thorp. The last time I read this particular book was twenty-three years ago when the movie version hit theaters. I loved the film—and after noticing in the credits it was based on a novel, I went out and tracked the title down. Having rediscovered this gem from the past, I sat down to read it again and found it just as enjoyable—if not more so—the second time around.

Originally published as Nothing Lasts Forever in 1979, the book was renamed Die Hard in its second edition and became the basis for one of the greatest action flicks of all time. The story, of course, involves an off-duty cop stuck in a Los Angeles skycraper that’s taken over by a dozen terrorists.

There are some major differences between the book and the film. In the book, the protagonist is an aged and retired New York City cop named Joe Leland who has flown to Los Angeles to see his estranged daughter–not a brash, young John McClane visiting his estranged wife. While the film featured some great humor to alleviate the tension, there is nothing funny about the book—the ending being a far cry from the film’s happy conclusion. The story is dark and brutal, and the violence is handled with a gritty realism. I was fifteen when I first read it and thought back then the violence was particularly savage. That’s actually one of the things I liked about it. I think it was the first book I read where violence had a visceral impact on one of the characters perpetrating it. Here, Leland is forced to kill a young terrorist:

[Leland’s] Browning struck a glancing blow off the side of the boy’s head, knocking him backward. He was still conscious, trying to get the Thompson up between them, when Leland hit him again, throwing his weight on him. The kid’s head struck the vinyl floor; the submachine gun went flying. The kid got to his hands and knees. He was stunned, trying to crawl away. Leland locked his forearm around the boy’s neck. He caught the windpipe. The kid’s hands came up. There was no time to waste. Leland got his shoulder against the base of the skull . . . The boy’s neck broke with a sound like a sapling being twisted in a strong man’s hands. His head flopped like a chicken’s. Leland’s bladder opened. He thought he was going to be sick.

You didn’t necessarily see that kind of brutality in the movie. Two of the terrorists Leland kills in the book are women, which takes a strong psychological toll on him. What I loved about the book—and the film—is the protagonist is an ordinary guy scared of the extraordinary circumstance thrust upon him. He’s no super-hero type:

He was feeling pain again, more than ever . . . He went up, one step at a time. He had been able to make a cup of coffee that had tasted awful, and then after that he had ducked into a ladies’ room to relieve himself and wash his face. All in the dark. He had not wanted to see himself. Afraid . . . He was so dirty, he could feel the crust on his eyelids when he blinked, in his crotch when he moved his legs. If he lived through this, he was going to feel pain for the rest of his life.

Thorp was a great writer (he passed away in 1999). At the time of his death, he was known for several gritty crime novels, including The Detective, which became a Frank Sinatra movie in 1968, and the excellent Rainbow Drive. Sadly, most of his books are now out of print (Nothing Lasts Forever, fortunately, has just been made available on Kindle). In reading the book, I was struck by the fact that if it wasn’t for the film “Die Hard”—and, to a certain extent, the Sinatra flick—hardly anyone today would know of Thorp’s work. Back in the day, when Thorp was writing, his novels were something of a big deal. This is from a 1986 profile in the Los Angeles Times following the release of Rainbow Drive:

Early indications are that Thorp will do well financially with the novel, which the publisher made its lead book for the fall season. Out of a first printing of 90,000 copies, 70,000 had been ordered by booksellers before “Rainbow Drive’s” publication date this fall. Bidding on paperback rights for the novel will start at $500,000.

The novelist added that the money probably won’t change his no-frills habits. A native of New York who moved to Southern California 10 years ago, Thorp lives in a two-bedroom apartment in North Hollywood, smokes plain-wrap cigarettes and drives a car that looks like an overweight roller skate.

“The quality of my life isn’t in shopping for gold-plated cars,” he said. “I value friendship, loyalty, truthfulness, honor–you know, the intrinsics that seem to have gone by the board. . . . I don’t care whether the neighbors know I’ve made it or not. I know who my neighbors are. Neighbors in my life have been some pretty goofy people I never cared about.”

Thorp had a real talent for writing hard, gritty crime stories. It’s sad that today most of his books are all but relegated to oblivion.

Human Game: “Those are my orders”

In publishing on October 9, 2012 at 7:50 am

What follows is an excerpt from the first chapter of Human Game.

“I have to acquaint you with a top secret matter.”

Kiel Gestapo chief Friedrich (Fritz) Schmidt sat behind his desk with a single sheet of paper in front of him. It was Wednesday, March 29, 1944.

“It is an order from the Führer. Four prisoners, who are with the Kripo at Flensburg, will be shot at a place determined by me. They are enemy agents who were condemned to death and tried to escape to Denmark. You, Major Post, will go to Flensburg and interrogate the prisoners. It is not expected they will make any statement. You will leave Flensburg by car and shoot them at a pre-arranged spot. Oskar Schmidt will see that the cremation is carried out and all formalities complied with. For the firing, service pistols will be used. If, contrary to expectations, an escape should be made, service rifles will be used, as pistols will not be sufficient.”

Thirty-eight-year-old Johannes Post was an ardent Nazi, fanatical in his loyalty to Hitler and intimidating to all who knew him. Although only five and a half feet tall, he boasted a solid physique—what some considered corpulent, and others thought imposing. His eyes—an arctic blue beneath a thick main of blond hair always brushed backward—rarely betrayed any emotion. Whatever moral convictions he possessed were solely defined by Nazi policy. He had, since the outbreak of the war and for the glory of the Reich, killed many he deemed inferior. Married with three young children, he spent little time with his family, preferring instead the company of his mistress.

Next to Post stood forty-three-year-old Oskar Schmidt and three other Gestapo officers. They received their instructions without protest, though some would later claim feeling ill at ease with their assignment. No such reservations burdened Post. He knew the condemned were British airmen, and he considered death by bullet too merciful. He listened attentively as Fritz Schmidt detailed what needed to be done. The shootings would take place in a meadow along a rural stretch of road about eight miles south of Kiel in the direction of Neumünster. The prisoners were to be escorted a good distance from the road so as to prevent any passing motorist from witnessing the murders. No official record of the slayings would be kept. Post was placed in charge of the overall operation.

“Anyone not complying with this order will have to reckon with immediate sentence of death and punitive measures against his family,” Fritz Schmidt said. “The same applies to anyone talking about the matter with outsiders.”

Schmidt walked around his desk and shook each man’s hand, binding him to secrecy. The meeting, having lasted no more than ten minutes, was over.

At that moment, unaware of the dark machinations at work, Australian Squadron Leader James Catanach sat in a cell in the police prison in Flensburg. Freedom had seemed so close just three days prior. For two years he had sat in Stalag Luft III, having arrived there after being shot down over Norway. The twenty-two year old spoke fluent German and believed, the night of the escape, that he harbored a fair chance of ultimately making it to neutral Sweden. Before the breakout, he partnered with flying officer Arnold Christensen of the Royal New Zealand Air Force. In the hours following the escape, the two men managed to make their way to the Sagan railway station and catch the 3:15 A.M. express to Berlin.

On the same train, also hoping to make Sweden, were fellow escapees Hallada Espelid and Nils Fuglesang, Norwegians with the Royal Air Force. They reached the capital shortly before 7:30 A.M., their journey having passed without incident. In the gray light of that cold winter morning, the men were perhaps satisfied to witness at ground level the devastation wrought by Allied bombers. The city was one of shattered architecture and gaunt, hollow expressions. They spent the night in Berlin, avoiding detection, and purchased train tickets the next day—March 26—to Flensburg on the Danish border. It was here, in this ancient city on the Baltic coast, that their bid for freedom came to an end. Catanach and Christensen were taken into police custody while walking along the Holm, a pedestrian thoroughfare in an area of the city that had thus far escaped bombardment. The two arresting officers were specifically on duty that night as a result of the Sagan breakout. In another part of town, Espelid and Fuglesang were apprehended at a police checkpoint on the Marienhölzungsweg. What aroused police suspicions and led to the arrests has been lost to history, the records having been destroyed by Allied bombs.

Once in custody, the men were taken to the local Kripo headquarters and briefly interrogated. Confessing to being officers of the Royal Air Force and fugitives from Stalag Luft III, they refused to surrender details regarding the escape’s planning and execution. They gave only their names and ranks, military identification numbers, and the route they had traveled while on the run. Their information was noted and forwarded to the Central Security Office in Berlin, where it followed a bureaucratic paper trail to Kaltenbrunner’s desk. From Kripo headquarters, the men were transferred to the city’s police prison and put in a cell. Three days had now past since their recapture; three days with no official word on what fate awaited them. They assumed the Germans would return them to a prison camp, as was normal protocol. The question was, were they destined once again for Sagan or a different compound altogether? On that Wednesday afternoon, an answer seemed close at hand.

The Gestapo men drove in two cars. Johannes Post and Inspector Hans Kaehler rode in a black four-seat Mercedes; Oskar Schmidt followed behind in a black six-seat Adler, with fellow officers Franz Schmidt (no relation) and Walter Jacobs. They arrived in Flensburg shortly after noon and stopped for lunch at the Harmonie restaurant. After their meal, they drove to the Polizeidirektion, where the four RAF officers were being detained. Prison officials, notified of the Gestapo’s pending arrival, retrieved the airmen from their cell and seated them in the main corridor, ready for transfer.

Post and his comrades arrived at the prison and separated the airmen for questioning, but fifteen minutes of futile interrogation failed to yield anything beyond what was already known. At 3 P.M., the prisoners were handcuffed—their wrists shackled behind their backs—and marched to the waiting cars outside. Post and Kaehler took custody of Catanach; Christensen, Espelid, and Fuglesang were bundled into the Adler with the two Schmidts and Walter Jacobs. The vehicles pulled away in a convoy, with the Mercedes leading. In the backseat, Catanach stared out the window as the gothic architecture of Flensburg eventually gave way to open road. The cars traveled via Schleswig Eckernvoerde in the direction of Kiel, the rolling country soon surrendering to a ravaged urban scene.

In the car’s front passenger seat, Post eyed his captive in the rearview mirror. He played morbid tour guide, pointing out Kiel’s once-great monuments and buildings recently devastated by Allied air raids. Catanach nodded and said he was most familiar with the city’s architecture, having flown several combat operations against Kiel before his capture. Post shrugged and lit a cigarette.

“We must get on,” he said. “I have to shoot you.”

Catanach turned his gaze from the window, puzzled. “What did you say?”

“I am going to shoot you,” Post repeated. “Those are my orders.”

It was well known in local Gestapo ranks that Post took great pleasure in telling prisoners they were doomed to die. He enjoyed their desperate pleas for mercy. Although Post knew Catanach spoke German, he addressed the airman in English.

“Do you mind?” the airman laughed, mistaking Post’s statement for a sick joke. “Another time. I have an appointment in the cooler of Stalag Luft III. I’ve done nothing wrong except go under the wire. You can’t shoot me.”

“Well,” Post said, “those are my orders.”

The car continued to navigate the city’s shattered streets. As the Mercedes turned a corner, Post barked an order to his driver, Artur Denkmann. He had tickets for the theater that night, but with the business now at hand, he was doubtful he would make the performance on time. Post directed Denkmann to an apartment building on the Hansastrasse. He pulled the tickets from the inside pocket of his gray leather overcoat and ordered Kaehler to run them upstairs to his mistress. When Kaehler returned several minutes later, the journey resumed without another word. The Mercedes left Kiel and headed south in the direction of Neumünster, along the Hamburger Chaussee. Roughly nine miles out of Kiel, where the road curved sharply to the right, the car pulled onto the right shoulder and came to a stop. Post ordered Kaehler, sitting next to Catanach, to remove the airman’s shackles and got out of the vehicle. During the car ride, when conversing with Catanach in English, Post had seemed almost jovial. Now he barked his orders in angry German and told Catanach to get out. The airman did as he was told but showed no sign of concern, apparently still believing Post’s earlier threat to be a morbid joke.

Post ordered Catanach to cross the road, where, directly opposite the Mercedes, a gate opened into a meadow bordered by hedgerow. Kaehler got out of the vehicle and followed them across the carriageway. Post stayed three steps behind Catanach and slid his right hand into his coat pocket as they approached the gate. Entering the meadow, Post marched Catanach to the left, concealing them behind the hedgerow. Catanach kept walking, not bothering to look back. Without uttering a word, Post pulled a Luger 7.65mm pistol from his pocket and fired. Catanach screamed, the slug striking him between the shoulder blades, and fell dead to the ground. As Post pocketed his weapon, he heard the second car arrive. Engine trouble in Kiel accounted for the Adler’s late arrival. Oskar Schmidt ordered his driver, Wilhelm Struve, to pull in behind the Mercedes and turned to the prisoners on the car’s folding backseat. The journey back to Sagan, he said, would take several more hours. The men would be wise to relieve themselves. He got out and opened the car’s rear left door for the airmen. Post stood watching impatiently at the gate, eager for what was coming.

Christensen, Espelid, and Fuglesang clambered out of the car—their wrists still shackled—with Walter Jacobs and Franz Schmidt behind them. Oskar Schmidt and his two partners marched the airmen across the roadway, toward the gate. It was five o’clock when they entered the meadow, and the men trod carefully in the fading light. Corralled by Post and the other agents behind them, they moved to the left of the gate. They were no more than seven steps from the gate when one of the airmen saw a dark object lying in the grass. The realization that it was James Catanach drew a panicked scream from one of the men. All three airmen jumped backward and tried to scramble as Jacobs and the two Schmidts drew their weapons.

“Shoot them!” Post roared. “Shoot them! Why don’t you shoot them?”

Three gun reports echoed across the meadow in the evening gloom. Two of the airmen fell lifeless alongside Catanach; the third hit the ground in apparent agony and made a feeble attempt to get back up. He struggled, his wrists still chained behind his back, and opened his mouth as though wanting to speak.

“He is still alive!” Post screamed. “I shall shoot him.”

He rushed at Kaehler and snatched the rifle from his hands. He approached the airman and put a bullet in his head. Satisfied the job was done, he ordered Kaehler to accompany him back to Kiel and told the others to guard the scene. Oskar Schmidt watched Post and Kaehler leave before turning his gaze to the bodies in the grass.

“He was not mine,” he said. “Mine died instantly.”

“And so did mine,” said Franz Schmidt.

Post still hoped to make the theater on time. The Mercedes sped north, back up the Hamburger Chaussee toward Kiel. Coffins were needed to transport the corpses to the local crematorium. Post directed his driver to Tischendorf’s, an undertaker at Karlstrasse 26. It was six o’clock when Post and Kaehler entered the establishment and spoke with Wilhelm Tischendorf, the proprietor. From the leather coats and long boots the men had on, Tischendorf presumed his customers were Gestapo.

“I need you to collect some prisoners who have been shot in the vicinity of Rotenhahn,” Post said by way of greeting, flashing his identification.

“What prisoners are they?” Tischendorf asked.

“French. Shot whilst trying to escape.”

Post said no more and returned to his waiting car. He left Kaehler to handle the details. Suspicious of Post, Tischendorf asked Kaehler who the prisoners were.
“They’re British airmen,” Kaehler said.

“Are they some of the seventy-six airmen I have read about in the papers?”

Kaehler answered in the affirmative.

“I shall have a car ready to leave in half an hour,” Tischendorf said.

Kaehler went outside and told Post, who nodded his approval. He ordered Kaehler to see the job through to its conclusion before demanding the driver return him to the apartment on the Hansastrasse, where his mistress waited with theater tickets.

The hearse—and two lidless, tin coffins—was ready sooner than expected. Tischendorf directed Kaehler to a parking lot behind the building, where he found two mortician laborers waiting in a burial van. Kaehler got in the front passenger seat and ordered the driver to get moving. The three men drove mostly in silence; Kaehler, giving directions, was the only one who spoke. As the van approached the right-hand bend on the Hamburger Chaussee, near the Rotenhahn, an inn and pub, Kaehler told the driver to slow down. The Adler was still parked on the right-hand side of the road, opposite the meadow’s entrance. Kaehler pointed to the gate, which was open, and ordered the driver to turn left into the field. He did not want passersby on the carriageway to witness the bodies being loaded. The driver, Wilhelm Boll, although worried the van’s wheels might get stuck in the damp earth, did as instructed. In the meadow, as he cut the van’s engine, Boll saw three men—one armed with a rifle—standing several feet off to his left.

Kaehler climbed out of the van; he had been gone no more than forty-five minutes. He ordered Boll and the other laborer, Artur Salau, to retrieve the two coffins from the back of the vehicle. The men did as they were told without comment and placed the caskets alongside the four bodies. Oskar Schmidt, charged with ensuring the victims were properly disposed of, ordered the bodies be stacked two to a coffin. The Gestapo men simply stood and watched as Boll and Salau commenced the morbid task. The bodies, both laborers noticed, were dressed in what appeared to be new civilian suits. Two of the dead men had bullet wounds to the head.

“If the Russians get here, they’ll do the same to us,” muttered one of the Gestapo agents.

Boll and Salau, wanting only to be done with the job, heard the comment but did not respond. They placed the bodies in the coffins and loaded the caskets into the back of the van. Oskar Schmidt ordered the bodies be taken immediately to the crematorium in Kiel. The journey back to the city was made in two cars. Boll and Salau drove the burial van, while the Gestapo agents followed close behind in the Adler. At the crematorium, on-duty engineer Arthur Schafer knew better than to question official Gestapo business. It was six-thirty when the four agents arrived, accompanied by two undertakers hauling four bodies in a pair of cheap coffins. It was Oskar Schmidt who did the talking.

“Here are four corpses to be cremated.”

“Do you have the necessary documents?” asked Schafer.

“Berlin has ordered it.”

Schafer opened the crematorium’s leather-bound register and reached for a pen.

“You will not make any entries.”

Although notified in advance that such a visit was likely, Schafer found the circumstances peculiar. Regulations, he said, dictated that names of the deceased be recorded. Schmidt told Schafer to enter each body in the register only as a Roman numeral, I through IV. The bodies were not to be assigned cremation numbers, nor were any notes to be made of the date.
“The corpses are those of prisoners who were shot whilst on the run,” Schmidt said.

Schafer did as instructed and asked the undertakers to carry the coffins to the furnace. Before consigning the bodies to flame, Schafer gave each one a cursory glance. All four victims were dressed in civilian clothing, wearing woolen underwear, woolen stockings, and woolen pullovers. He didn’t see any visible wounds. The four Gestapo men stayed until the bodies had been destroyed and the ashes relegated to four urns, each labeled with a Roman numeral I through IV. Walter Jacobs took possession of the urns, which were to be sent to Stalag Luft III for burial. By nine o’clock the agents were back at local Gestapo headquarters, their work done. Boll and Salau returned the burial van and checked in with their boss.

“Everything in order?” Tischendorf asked.

“Yes,” Boll replied.

“What kind of bodies were they?”

“They were all shot from the back.”

In another part of town, sitting with his mistress in a darkened theater, Johannes Post enjoyed that evening’s operatic performance. He had made the show on time.

Human Game: A (very) brief excerpt

In publishing on October 8, 2012 at 7:19 am

Well, Human Game was officially released last Tuesday. At this stage, it’s impossible to say how it’s doing—though the Amazon sales ranking has been hovering between 5,000 and 10,000 for most of the week. I realize that number doesn’t really tell authors what’s going on, but it’s a decent enough ranking out of the 4 million-plus books on Amazon. Publication day is a funny thing. If you’ve never experienced it before, it’s probably not at all like you imagine. Life pretty much goes on as normal!

I’ve received a couple of emails from readers who’ve already finished and enjoyed the book. That’s always a great compliment. If you’re reading this and currently have the book sitting on your bedside table waiting to be read, I hope you enjoy it, too! The book’s mention in this month’s Wired has certainly helped my cause. From my website stats, it’s clear more people are checking out my blog!

This brief excerpt from the book deals in part with atrocities committed against German civilians by the French. If keeping in mind the context of the times, one can understand the hatred harbored by the French, though it does nothing to excuse the actions described in the Human Game passage below. Resorting to the same brutal behavior as your enemy, makes you no better than the heinous regime you’ve been fighting against. The British, in their hunt for the Gestapo gunman who murdered fifty participants of “The Great Escape,” had to deal on a routine basis with the French. It was not an easy alliance, as French war crime investigators were not always willing to help and wanted to keep certain war criminals to themselves. It also emerged that some Nazis were released from French custody in exchange for not revealing the names of French officials who assisted Germany during the wartime occupation of France.

While the investigation made slow but steady progress in the British and American zones, efforts were under way to uncover leads in the French sector. Records at the French War Crimes and Political Prisoners Bureau in Paris were poorly organized—a result of the French frequently moving prisoners from one camp to another. The French were busy dismantling their smaller camps and transferring prisoners to larger facilities. Not until this process was complete and the smaller camps had been abolished was there any hope of the files being properly organized. In their sector, the French had assumed the role of conqueror and did little to hide their disdain for the vanquished population. As far as they were concerned, being a German—regardless of whether or not one was a Nazi—was crime enough. They had a grudge to settle. In the latter stages of the war, French forces—following behind the Americans—marched into Stuttgart and raped an estimated three thousand women and eight men. Likewise, in the small town of Freudenstadt, they raped women as old as eighty, burned homes and shot civilians. It was this sort of behavior one associated more with the Red Army, which, in the vast areas of Germany it overran, unleashed a frenzy of “looting, destruction and rape.” Noted one Danish journalist, “It was not that a sex-starved Russian soldier forced himself upon a girl who took his fancy. It was a destructive, hateful and wholesale act of vengeance. Age or looks were irrelevant. The grandmother was no safer than the granddaughter, the ugly and filthy no more than the fresh and attractive.”

Human Game: What would you have done?

In Random thoughts on September 27, 2012 at 9:48 pm

From “Human Game”: British investigators reconstruct the killings of two RAF airman following “The Great Escape.” (British National Archives: WO 309/1369)

The great thing about writing a non-fiction book—I’m guessing the same is true for authors of fiction—is that you often come away with a different viewpoint on things. Such was the case when writing Human Game. As folks who’ve visited this blog know by now, the book is a follow-up to the events depicted in the classic 1963 film “The Great Escape,” which details the mass breakout by Allied airmen from the infamous Stalag Luft III.

The story of the escape is well known and so is its immediate aftermath. Fifty of the recaptured escapees were turned over to the Gestapo and murdered. When I started writing the book, I assumed the gunmen would all turn out to be die-hard Nazis, fanatical in their beliefs. This, apparently, wasn’t the case. For certain, many were true believers who expressed pride in what they had done—a good number of them, however, were typical policemen who had seen their departments absorbed by the Gestapo and were subsequently ordered to commit murder. The men were told that if they did not follow through, harm would befall themselves and their families.

“I did this for personal reasons,” one killer told British investigators, “for the sake of my little daughter, the only member of my family still left to me from this tragic war.”

I’ve never accepted the defense of “I was just following orders”—but, as I worked on the book, I found myself wondering what I’d do under such circumstances. Obviously, I like to think I’d refuse any part in such a heinous scheme as described in Human Game. This, however, leads to another question: Would I have been willing to put my wife and son at risk?

It’s a tough one to answer.

Many of the gunmen, once captured, expressed remorse for their actions and claimed they only did it to protect their families. Again, this is no excuse for what they did. For every trigger pulled, there were families in numerous countries who lost fathers, sons, brothers, and husbands. But I hope it prompts those who read Human Game to ask themselves that uncomfortable question: “What would I have done?”

Approaching Zero Hour

In Random thoughts on September 26, 2012 at 10:41 am

I haven’t posted here in a while, as I’ve been distracted by the pending release of Human Game. We now have less than a week to go before D-Day. I’m very happy to say the book received a great mention in the October issue of Wired, on stands now. My publicist at Penguin is doing her utmost to score more publicity hits, as am I. This morning I was interviewed for a radio show on an NPR affiliate on the East Coast. In a couple of weeks, I’ll be on The John Batchelor Show, a radio program broadcast out of New York and heard nationwide.

In the meantime, we’re hoping to land at least a couple of reviews in the print media. One of the frustrating truths about publishing is it’s hard to be reviewed in major publications if you’re not a well-known commodity, yet it’s hard to become a well-known commodity without reviews in major publications. As Churchill said, one must K.B.O: Keep Buggering On.

Needless to say, I’m very proud of Human Game and hope it finds a significant audience. I think it’s an important book and one hell of a story—of course, one might argue my opinion is biased!

Random thoughts on Hemingway

In writers on September 11, 2012 at 9:46 am

Whenever time allows, I’m sitting down with another Hemingway biography. This one, written by Michael Reynolds, spans Hemingway’s life from the 1930s to that fateful day in 1961 in Ketchum, Idaho. With my sincere apologies to those who admire his work, I’ve never been a fan of Hemingway’s novels. While his style is celebrated for its economy of language, I find it somewhat flat. Although I find his novels tedious (again, sorry), I think his short stories are fantastic.

Although the Reynolds book is proving to be a great read, it’s also a difficult one. The reason has nothing to do with the writing, which is excellent, but the fact one has to spend 600 pages in Hemingway’s company. The man was an insecure, petulant, boorish braggart who treated friends and loved ones, including his four wives, terribly. He presented to the world an image of ultra-masculinity—hunting, fishing, going to wars, fighting—but in private was as fragile as a wilting flower. He seems to have spent most of his time raging against critics who dared question his work, friends who aggrieved him even slightly, his publisher for not doing enough to promote his books, and other authors who challenged his dominance in the literary world.

Looking back, there is something vulgar in Hemingway’s need to kill every sort of animal. This, of course, may no doubt be a view that’s distilled through today’s conservation efforts. On an African safari in 1934, he pouted like a child whenever another member of his party killed a larger animal or scored a better shot. Even more dispicable was his penchant for exaggerating his war service. Injured as a Red Cross worker in Italy during the First World War, he later told people he led elite Italian troops in battle. Following his stint as a correspondent in World War II, he felt the need to lie about his adventures in France, claiming at one point to have killed 126 Germans. He burned through three marriages before meeting Mary Welsh, who stuck with him until the end. She gave up her career as a journalist to be with him, as “Papa” did not like women who did not make his priorities their own. As Mary wrote in her journal one evening:

He has been truculent, brutal, abusive, and extremely childish . . . Last night with six at table, I declined to bet with one of our guests on a pigeon shooting match . . . So Ernest denounced me several times as a “cobarde” (coward) . . . At table his favorite and frequent means of protesting any word, glance, gesture or food he doesn’t like is to put his full, freshly served plate on the floor. The other day he dumped the entire plate of bread and crackers on top of my plate . . . he has called me, and repeated the names . . . whore, bitch, liar, moron. On several occasions I have called him a shit . . . it looks like the disintegration of a personality to me.

It’s hard to fathom why someone would treat another person this way. Just because the guy was one of the most influential authors of the twentieth century doesn’t excuse him from treating his wife in such an atrocious manner. In the end, regardless of the man’s contribution to American letters, and to quote Harold Robbins, “Hemingway was a jerk.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 138 other followers

%d bloggers like this: