simonreadbooks

An e-book can’t preserve family memories

In books, e-books on January 23, 2012 at 7:55 pm

For Christmas, my very generous wife gave me a Kindle Fire. Her message was clear: “E-books are the future. Why clutter our house with more books, when you can download them on this incredibly nifty gizmo and free-up some much needed shelf space?” While I’m certainly not a luddite, I am one who tends to romanticize the past and have long wished I lived in the 1920s or 1940s. In the twenties, it was fashionable to smoke and drink and hang out in Paris. In the forties, it was fashionable to smoke and drink and wear a fedora. There was, of course, WW2—but seeing as I’m a geek for history, that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

But, I digress . . . back to the Kindle Fire. The other night, I downloaded my first two books: Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and Michael Morpurgo’s War Horse. I plan to read both when I fly to England next week. I’ve already read the first few pages—or is it screens?—of Darkness and found it to be an okay experience. For one who loves the physical feel of a book, however, and the act of turning the page, it is slightly odd. My day job requires that I sit for eight hours and stare at a computer screen. If I’m working on a book, then I stare at a screen all evening after I get home. That being the case, I don’t really want to stare at another screen when I read for enjoyment. Don’t get me wrong: I’m willing to give the Kindle Fire a chance—and I do love the fact you can use it to stream movies. I’m just not sure it’ll ever become my preferred method of reading.

All this was driven home to me the other night as I casually browsed one of my bookshelves. I wasn’t looking for anything in particular—just looking. For no reason whatsoever, I pulled my copy of Stephen King’s Dreamcatcher from the shelf and randomly flipped through its pages. In the middle of the book, I came across four black-and-white photographs of my grandfather as a child. One picture, taken in 1920 when he was five, shows and his two sisters posting in their old-fashioned swimsuits in a Blackpool portrait studio. It was a pleasant surprise stumbling across these images I hadn’t looked at in several years. This sort of thing can’t happen with an e-book. Books (the paper variety) are great companions. Between their pages they can hold mementos of your life, whether it’s photographs, an old love letter, or a faded theater ticket. They can be reminders of friends and family and special events. Fred Vargas’s The Night’s Foul Work will always be the book I read on my honeymoon in Maui. Between its pages is the receipt for the whale-watching tour my wife and I went on.

Growing up, my parents always gave me books for my birthday and Christmas. Without exception, they always wrote something on the inside cover, saying they couldn’t wait to read my first published book. They offered nothing but encouragement, and those books are now something I treasure. You can’t do that with an e-book. You physically keep certain books with you throughout your life because of the memories attached to them. Is it possible to be that sentimental about an e-book?

I don’t think so.

About these ads
  1. And in a physical book inscriptions feel more meaningful and substantial, at least to me.

  2. I totally agree with you on this! I’m in the middle of an ongoing argument with my dad about the 600 books in my room, he thinks I should get a Kindle, I totally disagree!

    Nothing beats the surprise at finding a photo or an old note when you open a book for the first time in ages!

  3. I agree with you. I have not yet had an experience with an e-reader, but I know it will not capture the sound, feel, and smell of a book given to you with a memory attached.

  4. There’s just something about the scent of an old book. It’s been handled by priors before you, people who lived before you. The tales of yet another person is in print, in your hands, real or imagined or a combination of both, construed as “life experience.” These sensations cannot be replicated by a monochromatic Kindle, not even a Kindle that translates in multicolor pixels. It’s not the same.

    “All good books are alike in that they are truer than if they had really happened.”
    Ernest Hemingway

    While I think Kindle is awesome, I think it removes the reading experience in a way that can’t be reconstructed, and eventually, the reader’s experience of devouring the pages. Hemingway never saw a Kindle but he sure wouldn’t be fishing for stories with one.

    • Very true, Melissa . . . very true!

      Whenever I purchase a book from a second-hand book shop, I always wonder about the previous owner. It’s strange, because you’re sharing an experience with someone you’ve never met–and never will. You mentioned the “scent of an old book” . . . that’s something I’ve always liked, but can’t explain why. Yes, reading a book on Kindle does take away a lot of the sensations I associate with reading. It would certainly be interesting to see what Hemingway thought of e-books!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 138 other followers

%d bloggers like this: